A security guard, faced with an escalating confrontational situation, has attempted verbal de-escalation without success. The individual starts physically assaulting the guard, posing an immediate threat of bodily harm. According to Section 25 of the Criminal Code and the Use of Force Continuum, which of the following is the most legally defensible and appropriate next step for the security guard?

Question: A security guard, faced with an escalating confrontational situation, has attempted verbal de-escalation without success. The individual starts physically assaulting the guard, posing an immediate threat of bodily harm. According to Section 25 of the Criminal Code and the Use of Force Continuum, which of the following is the most legally defensible and appropriate next step for the security guard?

Answer options: ✅ Employ the minimum necessary force, up to and including defensive physical techniques, to stop the assault and ensure personal safety.

• Immediately retreat from the situation and wait for police, regardless of the ongoing threat.
• Use a conducted energy weapon (CEW) if available, without considering other options.
• Attempt further verbal de-escalation, even while being physically assaulted.

Correct answer: Employ the minimum necessary force, up to and including defensive physical techniques, to stop the assault and ensure personal safety.

Explanation: When de-escalation fails and there is an immediate threat, Section 25 protects the use of necessary force for self-preservation. The Use of Force Continuum dictates a response proportional to the threat, moving to defensive physical techniques to stop an assault.