Which best explains the purpose or principle behind controller indicator lamps verification (scenario variant 3)?

Question: Which best explains the purpose or principle behind controller indicator lamps verification (scenario variant 3)?

Answer options:

• Defer all action on controller indicator lamps verification (scenario variant 3) to the next annual inspection without notification ✅ The requirement defined for controller indicator lamps verification (scenario variant 3) is met and recorded on the ITM report
• Apply manufacturer marketing literature instead of the code for controller indicator lamps verification (scenario variant 3)
• Treat any anomaly in controller indicator lamps verification (scenario variant 3) as a non-deficiency regardless of severity

Correct answer: The requirement defined for controller indicator lamps verification (scenario variant 3) is met and recorded on the ITM report

Explanation: Per NFPA 25 §8.3.3 (annual flow test) / BC Fire Code 6.5.3, controller indicator lamps verification governs the correct procedure. Distractors omit or contradict the standard.