Skip to main content

RFPT Standpipe Systems (ST) · Question

Which best explains the purpose or principle behind lock-out/tag-out for isolation valves (scenario variant 28)?

Per NFPA 25 §6.3.1.1 (5-year flow) / NFPA 14 §7.2 (PRV), lock-out/tag-out for isolation valves governs the correct procedure. Distractors omit or contradict the

Start free practice for RFPT Standpipe Systems (ST)

250 questions · no signup required · 40 free questions per day

Start Practice →

Question: Which best explains the purpose or principle behind lock-out/tag-out for isolation valves (scenario variant 28)?

Answer options:

  • Use a generic municipal bylaw in place of the NFPA / referenced standard for lock-out/tag-out for isolation valves (scenario variant 28) ✅ The recognized standard procedure governing lock-out/tag-out for isolation valves (scenario variant 28) is applied as specified
  • Ignore the requirement for lock-out/tag-out for isolation valves (scenario variant 28) since it is non-mandatory
  • Replace the entire system rather than address lock-out/tag-out for isolation valves (scenario variant 28) per the standard

Correct answer: The recognized standard procedure governing lock-out/tag-out for isolation valves (scenario variant 28) is applied as specified

Explanation: Per NFPA 25 §6.3.1.1 (5-year flow) / NFPA 14 §7.2 (PRV), lock-out/tag-out for isolation valves governs the correct procedure. Distractors omit or contradict the standard.

Start free practice for RFPT Standpipe Systems (ST)

250 questions · no signup required · 40 free questions per day

Start Practice →

More about RFPT Standpipe Systems (ST)

Related Questions

More for RFPT Standpipe Systems (ST) candidates

Ready to practice?

Free, no signup required. Build a wrong-question list as you go.

Start Free RFPT Standpipe Systems (ST) Practice →

Related courses

Other Canadian certifications candidates often prepare for alongside this one.