RCMP Police Aptitude Battery (RPAB) · Question
Which of the following is an example of an inductive reasoning argument?
Inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to a general conclusion, which is what the swan example demonstrates. The conclusion is probable but not gu
Start free practice for RCMP Police Aptitude Battery (RPAB)
200 questions · no signup required · 40 free questions per day
Question: Which of the following is an example of an inductive reasoning argument?
Answer options: ✅ All observed swans are white; therefore, all swans are white.
- All men are mortal; Socrates is a man; therefore, Socrates is mortal.
- If it rains, the ground gets wet; it rained; therefore, the ground is wet.
- Either the car is red or blue; the car is not blue; therefore, the car is red.
Correct answer: All observed swans are white; therefore, all swans are white.
Explanation: Inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to a general conclusion, which is what the swan example demonstrates. The conclusion is probable but not guaranteed.
Start free practice for RCMP Police Aptitude Battery (RPAB)
200 questions · no signup required · 40 free questions per day
More about RCMP Police Aptitude Battery (RPAB)
Related Questions
- Map reading: heading north then turning right then right again leaves you facing:
- Conflict scenario: an angry citizen is shouting. De-escalation begins with:
- A 12-hour shift starts 19:00. It ends at:
- Best written-statement style for a notebook entry is:
- Reasoning: All RCMP cadets at Depot complete the Cadet Training Program. Sam completed CTP at Depot. Therefore
- A patrol covers 8 km in 20 min. Average speed (km/h) is:
More for RCMP Police Aptitude Battery (RPAB) candidates
Ready to practice?
Free, no signup required. Build a wrong-question list as you go.
Start Free RCMP Police Aptitude Battery (RPAB) Practice →Related courses
Other Canadian certifications candidates often prepare for alongside this one.